<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Tax  Lawyer&#039;s  Blog &#187; C Corporations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/CATEGORY/ccorporations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com</link>
	<description>Pappas on Taxation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Pappas on Taxation</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Tax  Lawyer&#039;s  Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Pappas on Taxation</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Stop Government Greed</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/10/20/greedy-non-human-corporations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/10/20/greedy-non-human-corporations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics of Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations are people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greedy corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax the rich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=27619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Hinderaker of Power Line writes what I wish I wrote about the inconsistency between the left&#8217;s objection to corporation&#8217;s being treated as people and their repeated accusation that corporations experience the human emotion of greed: Lately, we have heard a lot from the Wall Street occupiers as well as more mainstream Democrats about “greedy corporations.” But wait!  This is sheer anthropomorphism: if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/10/20/greedy-non-human-corporations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constructive Dividends and the Substance Over Form Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/09/19/constructive-dividends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/09/19/constructive-dividends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deductible Expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack townsend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substance over form]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=25832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Townsend has an excellent post today (all of his posts are excellent) about C corporation constructive dividends. In United States v. Ellefsen, ___ F.3d ___, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18684 (8th Cir. 2011), the appeals court addressed the issue of whether the IRS properly reclassified payments made by a C corporation to a trust, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/09/19/constructive-dividends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CEOs who Reduce Corporate Tax Liabilities Deserve High Compensation</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/08/31/ceos-who-reduce-corporate-tax-liabilities-deserve-high-compensation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/08/31/ceos-who-reduce-corporate-tax-liabilities-deserve-high-compensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deductible Expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics of Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excecutive compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter whoriskey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=25336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Whoriskey of the Washington Post apparently thinks he&#8217;s stumbled onto something important in Some Companies Pay Their CEOs More than Uncle Sam: It has become a bipartisan article of faith in some quarters that the income tax on U.S. corporations must be lowered. But for many large U.S. companies, the burden of U.S. taxation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/08/31/ceos-who-reduce-corporate-tax-liabilities-deserve-high-compensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney is Right: Corporations are People</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/08/15/romney-is-right-corporations-are-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/08/15/romney-is-right-corporations-are-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united. mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatiions are people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is a corporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=24596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard about the following exchange Mitt Romney had with an audience member at a political rally in Iowa last week. The man had asked the Republican front-runner how he would reduce the deficit: “One is we could raise taxes on people:  That’s not the way . . .” Romney said. “Corporations!” shouted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/08/15/romney-is-right-corporations-are-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Defense of Pass Through Entities</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/06/28/a-defense-of-pass-through-entities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/06/28/a-defense-of-pass-through-entities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bradley borden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pass through entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=22896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Caron reports that  Bradley T. Borden (Brooklyn) has posted a defense of pass-through entities in Three Cheers for Passthrough Taxation, 131 Tax Notes 1353 (June 27, 2011), on SSRN. Here&#8217;s the abstract: This report addresses recent suggestions by the Obama administration, lawmakers, and others that some passthrough entities should be taxed as corporations. It argues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/06/28/a-defense-of-pass-through-entities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Welfare?</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/06/08/corporate-welfare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/06/08/corporate-welfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=21961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WebCPA reports that 12 U.S. Corporations paid less than zero in federal taxes for the tax years 2008, 2009 and 2010: A dozen multinational corporations paid an effective tax rate of negative 1.5 percent on billions of dollars in profits while reaping billions in taxpayer subsidies. A new study by the advocacy group Citizens for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/06/08/corporate-welfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s High Corporate Tax Rate, or Why Corporations Relocate Abroad</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/03/05/americas-high-corporate-tax-rate-or-why-corporations-relocate-abroad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/03/05/americas-high-corporate-tax-rate-or-why-corporations-relocate-abroad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs overseas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mankiw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=21336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite economist (what, you don&#8217;t have one?) Greg Mankiw posted this interesting fact a few weeks ago: The U.S. effective corporate tax rate on new investment was 34.6 percent in 2010, which was the highest rate in the OECD and the fifth-highest rate among 83 countries. The average OECD rate was 18.6 percent, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2011/03/05/americas-high-corporate-tax-rate-or-why-corporations-relocate-abroad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice to Would-Be Schedule C Filers: &#8220;DON&#8217;T&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/11/08/advise-to-would-be-schedule-c-filers-dont/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/11/08/advise-to-would-be-schedule-c-filers-dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Employed Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form of business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[llc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert flach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schedule c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sole proprietorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wandering tax pro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=19847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Flach announces his publication of a new newsletter for sole proprietors and single-member schedule C filers entitled, aptly enough, The Schedule C Letter: THE SCHEDULE C LETTER is a bi-weekly newsletter that provides tax planning and preparation advice, information, and resources for sole proprietors and one-person LLCs who report their business activity on IRS Schedule C.¹ I have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/11/08/advise-to-would-be-schedule-c-filers-dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Blame Me, I Told you to Incorporate.</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/11/01/dont-blame-me-i-told-you-to-incorporate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/11/01/dont-blame-me-i-told-you-to-incorporate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes 101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form of business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[llc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schedule c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schedule c audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sole proprietor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=19663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And we thought we had settled the issue of whether new business owners should incorporate, form an LLC or save a few hundred bucks and operate as a sole proprietorship. Today WebCPA reports that the IRS plans to fiurther intensify its audits of sole proprietorships (emphasis is mine): The Internal Revenue Service will be taking addit:ional steps to check on whether sole [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/11/01/dont-blame-me-i-told-you-to-incorporate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS to Pursue Non Filing Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/10/05/irs-to-pursue-non-filing-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/10/05/irs-to-pursue-non-filing-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Employed Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfiled Returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form of business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government accountability office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non filers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasons to incorporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schedule c audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=19399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequent readers of this blog know that we have maintained - ad nauseum, I am sure, for some &#8211; that all small businesses should incorporate or operate as an LLC in part because they are less likely to undergo IRS scrutiny. Well, if you can believe the Government Accountability Office GAO), this may all be about to change. WebCPA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/10/05/irs-to-pursue-non-filing-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repeal the New 1099 Law</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/06/01/repeal-the-new-1099-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/06/01/repeal-the-new-1099-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Employed Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate 1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs matching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business 1099]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=17255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Association for the Self-Employed reports that the recently enacted Healthcare law will have an onerous record-keeping effect on small businesses: Many of the nation’s entrepreneurs are about to become more familiar with IRS Form 1099. According to a new law set to go into effect in 2012, business owners will be required to submit a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2010/06/01/repeal-the-new-1099-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Dividends are Taxed at Lower Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/12/why-dividends-are-taxed-at-lower-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/12/why-dividends-are-taxed-at-lower-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate double tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax the rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation of dividends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JLP of All Financial Matters tells us why it makes sense that dividends are taxed at lower rates: BG left the following comment on one of my previous posts: “JLP won’t like me saying it, but even the ultra-rich play this game where their “income” (dividends &#38; investments make up the majority of their income) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/12/why-dividends-are-taxed-at-lower-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repeal the Corporate Income Tax and Bring Those Jobs Back Home</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/01/18/repeal-the-corporate-income-tax-and-bring-those-jobs-back-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/01/18/repeal-the-corporate-income-tax-and-bring-those-jobs-back-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax havens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gao study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overseas jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax loopholes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=2893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read two weekend posts by Paul Caron of TaxProf Blog titled GAO: 83% of Largest U.S. Companies Use Offshore Tax Havens; and WSJ: Best Economic Stimulus: A Corporate Tax Rate of Zero.  In the first post, Professor Caron reports that a General Accountability Office (GAO) study indicates that more than 2/3rds of America&#8217;s largest corporations have subsidiaries in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/01/18/repeal-the-corporate-income-tax-and-bring-those-jobs-back-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Commissioner Vows to Go After International Tax Schemes</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/10/irs-commissioner-addresses-international-tax-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/10/irs-commissioner-addresses-international-tax-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doug shulman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multinational tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax audits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=2050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS Commissioner, Doug Schulman, addressed the 21st George Washington University International Tax Conference on Monday and said, Tax administrators and tax professionals find themselves with a new, heightened and highly visible global role. It’s fair to say that U.S. taxpayers’ attitudes and perceptions about the taxes they pay reflect the changing world around them. We [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/10/irs-commissioner-addresses-international-tax-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well&#8217;s Fargo Rule May Be Reversed (For Everyone But Well&#8217;s Fargo)</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/11/22/wells-fargo-rule-may-be-reversed-for-everyone-but-wells-fargo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/11/22/wells-fargo-rule-may-be-reversed-for-everyone-but-wells-fargo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[382 notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[built in losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying nols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net operating losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wachovia merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=1714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Kristan blogged yesterday in a post titled Congress Eyes Reversal of Section 382 Bank Notice that, Ways and Means Democrats introduced legislation to repeal the IRS notice (Notice 2008-83) that exempts bad loans from the Section 382 &#8220;built-in loss&#8221; rules. The legislation would repeal the notice effective on the earlier of passage by Ways and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/11/22/wells-fargo-rule-may-be-reversed-for-everyone-but-wells-fargo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we Kill the Corporate Income Tax? One Man&#8217;s Argument for Assassination</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/25/should-we-kill-the-corporate-income-tax-one-mans-argument-for-assassination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/25/should-we-kill-the-corporate-income-tax-one-mans-argument-for-assassination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eliminate the corporate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO study on corporate tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again on TaxProf Blog I find a link to an interesting tax article, 20 Reasons to Kill the Corporate Tax, written by (fellow Greek?) James Pethokoukis of U.S News and World Report. Here are Pethokoukis&#8217; more interesting (and rarely mentioned) reasons for eliminating the corporate income tax: 4. Some 70 percent of the corporate tax burden is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/25/should-we-kill-the-corporate-income-tax-one-mans-argument-for-assassination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Foundation Launches CompeteUSA to Combat High Corporate Taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/19/tax-foundation-launches-competeusa-to-combat-high-corporate-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/19/tax-foundation-launches-competeusa-to-combat-high-corporate-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tax Foundation has launched a program called CompeteUSA designed to educate the public on the adverse impact of high business taxes.  [CompeteUSA's] goal is to raise the public’s awareness of America’s high business taxes and how those taxes are affecting our competitiveness, wages, and living standards. The wages and living standards of American workers are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/19/tax-foundation-launches-competeusa-to-combat-high-corporate-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and The Scapegoating of Corporations</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dorgan levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO corporate tax study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a study released by the Scapegoat Society titled, Constructive Inquiry Into the Nature and Nuetralizing of Blame, scapegoating is, [a] hostile social/psychological discrediting routine by which people move blame and responsibility away from themselves and towards a target person or group. A new GAO study requested by Democrat Senators Byron Dorgan (North Dakota) and Carl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

