<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cosmetic Surgery Tax: Is the Senate Healthcare Bill Sexist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/</link>
	<description>Pappas on Taxation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>TJ,

I&#039;m afraid you miss the point completely. 

Going to the mall is elective. Let&#039;s tax that, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TJ,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid you miss the point completely. </p>
<p>Going to the mall is elective. Let&#8217;s tax that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-6561</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-6561</guid>
		<description>This kind of surgery is ELECTIVE!!  HELLLLOOOO !!    The patient can choose not to pay the tax by not having the procedure in the first place.  
The would be patient laments:  &quot;Damn, my boobs aren&#039;t big enough for my liking, but the gov&#039;t wants to charge me extra if I want to have them enlarged?&quot;

I don&#039;t care if you make $25K a year, or $25 million a year.  BOO HOO for you!!  The surgery is your choice, it isn&#039;t being forced upon you.

As a point of comparison, the gov&#039;t also charges huge, huge taxes on things like alcohol and cigarettes.  So if 75% of beer drinkers are men, does that mean that the tax on alcohol is sexist???   C&#039;mon people, this isn&#039;t hard to figure out!  The gov&#039;t wants to make more money; that&#039;s what those d-bags in Washington are there for.  And they know that one of the best ways to do that is to pray on people&#039;s vulnerabilities and addictions.  And that&#039;s precisely what they&#039;re doing with this law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of surgery is ELECTIVE!!  HELLLLOOOO !!    The patient can choose not to pay the tax by not having the procedure in the first place.<br />
The would be patient laments:  &#8220;Damn, my boobs aren&#8217;t big enough for my liking, but the gov&#8217;t wants to charge me extra if I want to have them enlarged?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if you make $25K a year, or $25 million a year.  BOO HOO for you!!  The surgery is your choice, it isn&#8217;t being forced upon you.</p>
<p>As a point of comparison, the gov&#8217;t also charges huge, huge taxes on things like alcohol and cigarettes.  So if 75% of beer drinkers are men, does that mean that the tax on alcohol is sexist???   C&#8217;mon people, this isn&#8217;t hard to figure out!  The gov&#8217;t wants to make more money; that&#8217;s what those d-bags in Washington are there for.  And they know that one of the best ways to do that is to pray on people&#8217;s vulnerabilities and addictions.  And that&#8217;s precisely what they&#8217;re doing with this law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanning Tax? How About a Tax on Hip Hop Music?</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-4849</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanning Tax? How About a Tax on Hip Hop Music?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-4849</guid>
		<description>[...] Cosmetic Surgery Tax: Is the Senate Healthcare Bill Sexist? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cosmetic Surgery Tax: Is the Senate Healthcare Bill Sexist? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanning Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanning Tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Botax Protest in Times Square</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3592</link>
		<dc:creator>Botax Protest in Times Square</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3592</guid>
		<description>[...] The Cosmetic Surgery Tax: Is the Senate Healthcare Bill Sexist? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Cosmetic Surgery Tax: Is the Senate Healthcare Bill Sexist? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Anderson&#8217;s Bodacious Pair . . . of Tax Liens.</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Anderson&#8217;s Bodacious Pair . . . of Tax Liens.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>Dr. Soto,

Thanks for the comment.

This is just another attempt by the nanny state to control the markets. I don&#039;t like it any more than I like taxes on sodas and bad foods.

Let&#039;s face it, we all consume something that isn&#039;t good for  us. For instance, one of the worst things for kids is too much TV and video games because it makes them obese from a lack of exercise. How about we put a 5% surtax on the purchase of a 50 inch Vizio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Soto,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>This is just another attempt by the nanny state to control the markets. I don&#8217;t like it any more than I like taxes on sodas and bad foods.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, we all consume something that isn&#8217;t good for  us. For instance, one of the worst things for kids is too much TV and video games because it makes them obese from a lack of exercise. How about we put a 5% surtax on the purchase of a 50 inch Vizio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>Hi Eve,

Thanks for visiting.

Interesting point about Viagra, but then again doesn&#039;t that also help women?

; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eve,</p>
<p>Thanks for visiting.</p>
<p>Interesting point about Viagra, but then again doesn&#8217;t that also help women?</p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armando Soto, MD, FACS</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3346</link>
		<dc:creator>Armando Soto, MD, FACS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3346</guid>
		<description>First- full disclosure- I&#039;m a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon. However, the truth is the truth...

Effective taxes are broadly based and have a low rate... 

And this tax IS sexist- as the majority of those affected WILL be women, who represent roughly 90% of those choosing aesthetic procedures.

It is also not effective (ask New Jersey), and unfair- the vast majority of my patients are working women making between $25,000 and $80,000 a year. How do they do it? They save their pennies and sometimes finance the procedure the way we all finance anything else that is important to us (cars, homes, stereo equipment). 

So rather than do the right thing- the thing most other progressive nations do to balance the health care books- force healthy young people to &quot;buy in&quot; to the system that will eventually take care of them when they age and become ill, and limit the tremendous profits American Insurance companies are making, we&#039;re going to increase the tax burden on young working women. Really??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First- full disclosure- I&#8217;m a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon. However, the truth is the truth&#8230;</p>
<p>Effective taxes are broadly based and have a low rate&#8230; </p>
<p>And this tax IS sexist- as the majority of those affected WILL be women, who represent roughly 90% of those choosing aesthetic procedures.</p>
<p>It is also not effective (ask New Jersey), and unfair- the vast majority of my patients are working women making between $25,000 and $80,000 a year. How do they do it? They save their pennies and sometimes finance the procedure the way we all finance anything else that is important to us (cars, homes, stereo equipment). </p>
<p>So rather than do the right thing- the thing most other progressive nations do to balance the health care books- force healthy young people to &#8220;buy in&#8221; to the system that will eventually take care of them when they age and become ill, and limit the tremendous profits American Insurance companies are making, we&#8217;re going to increase the tax burden on young working women. Really??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eve stefani</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator>eve stefani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3345</guid>
		<description>This doesn&#039;t surprise me... Now I want to see in the bill  is the elimination of paying for Viagra and the like...that would be akin to elective enhancement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t surprise me&#8230; Now I want to see in the bill  is the elimination of paying for Viagra and the like&#8230;that would be akin to elective enhancement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3343</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3343</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Thanks for coming.

I had my tongue firmly implanted in my cheek when I suggested that the cosmetic surgery tax is sexist. I know it irks the liberals when their hypocrisy is exposed.

By the way, states already mandate that retailers collect and remit sales tax from their customers. I suppose the 5% surtax will work just like a sales tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Thanks for coming.</p>
<p>I had my tongue firmly implanted in my cheek when I suggested that the cosmetic surgery tax is sexist. I know it irks the liberals when their hypocrisy is exposed.</p>
<p>By the way, states already mandate that retailers collect and remit sales tax from their customers. I suppose the 5% surtax will work just like a sales tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/11/19/the-cosmetic-surgery-tax-is-the-senate-healthcare-bill-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=11399#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this tax sexist and discriminatory - since 90% of cosmetic surgery patients are women?  And how fair is it for the doctor to be on the hook if the patient doesn&#039;t pay the tax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this tax sexist and discriminatory &#8211; since 90% of cosmetic surgery patients are women?  And how fair is it for the doctor to be on the hook if the patient doesn&#8217;t pay the tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

