<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrat Senator: Healthcare Bill too Confusing to Read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/</link>
	<description>Pappas on Taxation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamacare Bill is 12 times the Size of the U.S. Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamacare Bill is 12 times the Size of the U.S. Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2980</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2980</guid>
		<description>Happy,

I agree there are too many entrenched incumbents, but I oppose term limits because I think they are undemocratic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy,</p>
<p>I agree there are too many entrenched incumbents, but I oppose term limits because I think they are undemocratic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HappyTaxDude</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>HappyTaxDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>Peter,
I don&#039;t think there is nearly as much turnover of politicians in Washington as there should be.  But, you&#039;re right, we do have a government run by unelected staffers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
I don&#8217;t think there is nearly as much turnover of politicians in Washington as there should be.  But, you&#8217;re right, we do have a government run by unelected staffers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2978</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2978</guid>
		<description>Linda,

Thanks for visiting.

Staffers run Washington because the turnover of politicians is so great yet we never voted for those staffers.

That is undemocratic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda,</p>
<p>Thanks for visiting.</p>
<p>Staffers run Washington because the turnover of politicians is so great yet we never voted for those staffers.</p>
<p>That is undemocratic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2977</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2977</guid>
		<description>Hi Roxana,

I am not sure it&#039;s possible to write legislation as expansive as this healthcare bill in a simple manner.

But the fact the bill is difficult to read shouldn&#039;t stop Congressmen who are voting on the damn thing from reading it.

If they want to resign from Congress they are welcome to read &quot;The Cat in the Hat&quot; for the rest of their adult lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roxana,</p>
<p>I am not sure it&#8217;s possible to write legislation as expansive as this healthcare bill in a simple manner.</p>
<p>But the fact the bill is difficult to read shouldn&#8217;t stop Congressmen who are voting on the damn thing from reading it.</p>
<p>If they want to resign from Congress they are welcome to read &#8220;The Cat in the Hat&#8221; for the rest of their adult lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrat Senator: Healthcare Bill too Confusing to Read &#124; taxattorneystate.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrat Senator: Healthcare Bill too Confusing to Read &#124; taxattorneystate.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%!  I called my reps and was ignored.  I cannot believe that people run for a position where they are supposed to know what is going on and they don&#039;t.  We need to vote them out and start again!  Peter Schiff who is running again Chris Dodds in Conn. has youtube video&#039;s where he predicted what would happen with the financial meltdown in 2006.  Perhaps if our elected reps read the bills they were passing they would have known also!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%!  I called my reps and was ignored.  I cannot believe that people run for a position where they are supposed to know what is going on and they don&#8217;t.  We need to vote them out and start again!  Peter Schiff who is running again Chris Dodds in Conn. has youtube video&#8217;s where he predicted what would happen with the financial meltdown in 2006.  Perhaps if our elected reps read the bills they were passing they would have known also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxana</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2009/10/04/democrat-senator-healthcare-bill-too-confusing-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=10171#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>While I agree the healthcare bill is confusing and difficult to read I expect that our lawmakers be fluent in legalese. 

Can you maybe explain or give an opinion as to why we still write laws/legal documents in such convoluted language?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree the healthcare bill is confusing and difficult to read I expect that our lawmakers be fluent in legalese. </p>
<p>Can you maybe explain or give an opinion as to why we still write laws/legal documents in such convoluted language?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

