<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRS Audit Red Flags: A Rebuttal of Robert Flach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/06/30/irs-audit-red-flags-a-rebuttal-of-robert-flach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/06/30/irs-audit-red-flags-a-rebuttal-of-robert-flach/</link>
	<description>tax, finance, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:40:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wandering Tax Pro Responds, Pappas Dons Flach Jacket</title>
		<link>http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/06/30/irs-audit-red-flags-a-rebuttal-of-robert-flach/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Wandering Tax Pro Responds, Pappas Dons Flach Jacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=6414#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is Robert Flach&#8217;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is Robert Flach&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/06/30/irs-audit-red-flags-a-rebuttal-of-robert-flach/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=6414#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>David,

Thanks for visiting.

It&#039;s not folklore.

These are areas that the IRS has identified as being historically rife with abuse, therefore, it follows that IRS examiners would more closely scrutinize them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Thanks for visiting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not folklore.</p>
<p>These are areas that the IRS has identified as being historically rife with abuse, therefore, it follows that IRS examiners would more closely scrutinize them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Potts</title>
		<link>http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/06/30/irs-audit-red-flags-a-rebuttal-of-robert-flach/comment-page-1/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>David Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=6414#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>Are the &quot;5 Reg Flags&quot; more folklore or has the IRS issued statements identifying these red flags?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the &#8220;5 Reg Flags&#8221; more folklore or has the IRS issued statements identifying these red flags?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
