Thanks for your comment.

I disagree.

If the Supreme Court says a law is constitutional, it is constitutional.

Period!

The Supreme Court is the last word on matters of law. And we have to have a last word otherwise issues of law can never be resolved.

You do an excellent job of illustrating the conspiratorialist tactic of accusing those with whom you disagree of being in on the scam.

First, you say that the Supreme Court is part of the conspiracy and then you say that I am a co-conspirator “shill for the system.”

This is typical of the conspiratorialist. When he can’t gain a particular convert (which is most of the time) he accuses him or her of being in on the scam.

Intelligent people see this for what it is: A cynical attempt to censor anyone who does not share your fringe view of the unconstitutionality of the federal income tax.

But it won’t work with me so save your breath.

I only say that Schiff is off his rocker because his lawyer, who has a duty of candor toward the tribunal, filed a sworn affidavit saying he is legally insane.

Finally, comparing me to the Soviets is just plain silly.

I don’t think people like you and Schiff and Larken Rose should be censored and put in a Gulag.

Quite the contrary, I think the more we let you spew the less likely it is you will gain converts.

Your “arguments” have been shot down more often than Charles Manson’s requests for parole.

But that does NOT mean, that the income tax, (as is the Federal Reserve Act and Bank) is not unconstitutional. It is, EVEN if the Supreme Court were to find otherwise. After all, the Supreme Court is only an arm of that entity, that is unconstitutionally arrogating this power to itself.

But because this is not likely to change any time soon, the protesters are misguided for thinking they can find a way to argue within against this.
Because the government has the gun here, there is no way out.

You sir, however, mocking those that believe in the unconstitutionality itself, are just a shill for the system.
People need to pay not the government has a RIGHT to the money, it doesn’t, but because it has the MIGHT to take it.

About Irwin Schiff: His lawyers may be forgiven for pulling an insanity defense, but for you to go there is no different than what the Soviets did. You are justifying defining dissent as mental illness, just as left-wingers want to define racisms as that.
That is truly sick, not those differring in their beliefs from yours.