<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volume #4 &#8211; Absurd Tax Protester Arguments &#8211; Wages are Not Taxable Income</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/02/volume-4-absurd-tax-protester-arguments-wages-are-not-taxable-income/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/02/volume-4-absurd-tax-protester-arguments-wages-are-not-taxable-income/</link>
	<description>Pappas on Taxation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frivolous Tax Arguments 2011 Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/02/volume-4-absurd-tax-protester-arguments-wages-are-not-taxable-income/comment-page-1/#comment-9128</link>
		<dc:creator>Frivolous Tax Arguments 2011 Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=1851#comment-9128</guid>
		<description>[...] Contention: Wages, tips, and other compensation received for personal services are not income  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contention: Wages, tips, and other compensation received for personal services are not income  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Scammer Enjoined from Promoting Tax Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/02/volume-4-absurd-tax-protester-arguments-wages-are-not-taxable-income/comment-page-1/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Scammer Enjoined from Promoting Tax Scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=1851#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>[...] wouldn&#8217;t have to pay income taxes if they relinquished their Social Security numbers, that wages aren&#8217;t income subject to tax and that the Internal Revenue Service has jurisdiction only in federally administered territories, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wouldn&#8217;t have to pay income taxes if they relinquished their Social Security numbers, that wages aren&#8217;t income subject to tax and that the Internal Revenue Service has jurisdiction only in federally administered territories, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Scammer Enjoined from Promoting Tax Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/12/02/volume-4-absurd-tax-protester-arguments-wages-are-not-taxable-income/comment-page-1/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Scammer Enjoined from Promoting Tax Scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=1851#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>[...] wouldn&#8217;t have to pay income taxes if they relinquished their Social Security numbers, that wages aren&#8217;t income subject to tax and that the Internal Revenue Service has jurisdiction only in federally administered territories, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wouldn&#8217;t have to pay income taxes if they relinquished their Social Security numbers, that wages aren&#8217;t income subject to tax and that the Internal Revenue Service has jurisdiction only in federally administered territories, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

