<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can a Tax Credit be &#8220;Budget Neutral?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/10/03/how-can-a-tax-credit-be-budget-neutral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/10/03/how-can-a-tax-credit-be-budget-neutral/</link>
	<description>Pappas on Taxation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/10/03/how-can-a-tax-credit-be-budget-neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=925#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Tina, thanks for the nice words. I read The 16th Amendment over at Peterman&#039;s Eye.  I found this statement interesting:

&quot;Today, the complete tax code, with accompanying regulations, contains over 60,000 pages and is so complicated that even CPA’s don’t understand it. At least mine doesn’t.&quot;
 
I think Peterman needs a new tax advisor.

I know a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tina, thanks for the nice words. I read The 16th Amendment over at Peterman&#8217;s Eye.  I found this statement interesting:</p>
<p>&#8220;Today, the complete tax code, with accompanying regulations, contains over 60,000 pages and is so complicated that even CPA’s don’t understand it. At least mine doesn’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Peterman needs a new tax advisor.</p>
<p>I know a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Marhsall</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/10/03/how-can-a-tax-credit-be-budget-neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Marhsall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=925#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Greetings,
   I found what you said very insightful- it&#039;s hard to pick up some of the minuscule details when listening to the fast-paced nature of the debate.  I appreciate sites like this that break it down.
  I came across another blog this morning about taxes..much more simple and enjoyable than what our systems entails today. Thought you might find it interesting. (It&#039;s the article titled the 16th Amendment.)
  http://www.petermanseye.com/
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,<br />
   I found what you said very insightful- it&#8217;s hard to pick up some of the minuscule details when listening to the fast-paced nature of the debate.  I appreciate sites like this that break it down.<br />
  I came across another blog this morning about taxes..much more simple and enjoyable than what our systems entails today. Thought you might find it interesting. (It&#8217;s the article titled the 16th Amendment.)<br />
  <a href="http://www.petermanseye.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.petermanseye.com/</a><br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

