<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and The Scapegoating of Corporations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/</link>
	<description>Pappas on Taxation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-9330</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-9330</guid>
		<description>Marc,

Thanks for visiting.

Every study I have read shows that the rich pay more than their &quot;fair&quot; share. Of course, people can spin those studies to their own advantage.

I don&#039;t think you want the rich to pay more because they live in a society that makes it possible for them to be rich - the poor and the middle class live in the same society - but rather because they are &lt;em&gt;successful&lt;/em&gt; in that society.

I think we should &lt;em&gt;reward&lt;/em&gt; rather than punish people who support their own, do not become dependent on government and employee others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>Thanks for visiting.</p>
<p>Every study I have read shows that the rich pay more than their &#8220;fair&#8221; share. Of course, people can spin those studies to their own advantage.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you want the rich to pay more because they live in a society that makes it possible for them to be rich &#8211; the poor and the middle class live in the same society &#8211; but rather because they are <em>successful</em> in that society.</p>
<p>I think we should <em>reward</em> rather than punish people who support their own, do not become dependent on government and employee others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-9329</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-9329</guid>
		<description>You conveniently left out the part where the individuals getting the 20, 30, 40 mil--as bonuses--only pay 15% because they are considered &quot;capital gains&quot;.

Again, they are not paying their fair share, and I agree with the long, lost, conservative belief which says the wealthy should pay more than joe the plummer, because they have a responsibility to the same society that makes it possible for them to be this wealthy. Do you think they could be this successful in any other country? Didn&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You conveniently left out the part where the individuals getting the 20, 30, 40 mil&#8211;as bonuses&#8211;only pay 15% because they are considered &#8220;capital gains&#8221;.</p>
<p>Again, they are not paying their fair share, and I agree with the long, lost, conservative belief which says the wealthy should pay more than joe the plummer, because they have a responsibility to the same society that makes it possible for them to be this wealthy. Do you think they could be this successful in any other country? Didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-9020</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-9020</guid>
		<description>Paul,

&lt;em&gt;&quot;How do I know you’re not doing the same, if you don’t give me a link to the study?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

You don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p><em>&#8220;How do I know you’re not doing the same, if you don’t give me a link to the study?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-9018</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-9018</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Go after whomever you like.

LLC is an accepted designation for tax purposes, but you file the results of your operations on either a Schedule C form, a partnership form or an S corporation form. There is no LLC tax form.

The Republicans get all of their really good ideas from me, not the other way around. Thanks for the compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Go after whomever you like.</p>
<p>LLC is an accepted designation for tax purposes, but you file the results of your operations on either a Schedule C form, a partnership form or an S corporation form. There is no LLC tax form.</p>
<p>The Republicans get all of their really good ideas from me, not the other way around. Thanks for the compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-9006</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-9006</guid>
		<description>&quot;As usual, cynical politicians are counting on Americans to not actually read the study.&quot;

How do I know you&#039;re not doing the same, if you don&#039;t give me a link to the study?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As usual, cynical politicians are counting on Americans to not actually read the study.&#8221;</p>
<p>How do I know you&#8217;re not doing the same, if you don&#8217;t give me a link to the study?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-9005</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-9005</guid>
		<description>So, instead of going after News Corp for tax evasion, I should go after Rupert Murdoch.  

LLC is not an accepted designation for tax purposes.  They must file under another designation, according to your own link.

Thanks, D. Lynn, for the clarity there!

And thank you, Republican Mouthpiece Blog!  You&#039;ve helped me so much, by showing plainly how you people try to obscure the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, instead of going after News Corp for tax evasion, I should go after Rupert Murdoch.  </p>
<p>LLC is not an accepted designation for tax purposes.  They must file under another designation, according to your own link.</p>
<p>Thanks, D. Lynn, for the clarity there!</p>
<p>And thank you, Republican Mouthpiece Blog!  You&#8217;ve helped me so much, by showing plainly how you people try to obscure the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Business Tax Burden Increased in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>US Business Tax Burden Increased in 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 12:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations   Bookmark &amp; Share: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations   Bookmark &amp; Share: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Lies: U.S. Corporations Pay Little or No Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-5468</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Lies: U.S. Corporations Pay Little or No Tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 04:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-5468</guid>
		<description>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations  Bookmark &amp; Share: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations  Bookmark &amp; Share: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSJ: Time to Repeal the Corporate Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>WSJ: Time to Repeal the Corporate Tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 02:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-5379</guid>
		<description>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations  Bookmark &amp; Share: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations  Bookmark &amp; Share: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeal the Corporate Income Tax and Bring Those Jobs Back Home</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeal the Corporate Income Tax and Bring Those Jobs Back Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-638</guid>
		<description>[...] few months ago the GAO came under fire for releasing a report that showed that most U.S. corporations don&#8217;t pay any tax at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago the GAO came under fire for releasing a report that showed that most U.S. corporations don&#8217;t pay any tax at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ways &#38; Means Chairman Charlie Rangel Wants to Reduce Corporate Tax Rate to 28%</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ways &#38; Means Chairman Charlie Rangel Wants to Reduce Corporate Tax Rate to 28%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-430</guid>
		<description>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GAO Study on Corporate Taxes and the Scapegoating of Corporations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-379</guid>
		<description>D. Lynn,

ALL corporations were included in the study, not just the C corporations. 

And 66% of the corporations are S  corporations that are not required to pay tax.

For statistics on S Corporations visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/bustaxstats/article/0,,id=96405,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IRS S Corporation Stats&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D. Lynn,</p>
<p>ALL corporations were included in the study, not just the C corporations. </p>
<p>And 66% of the corporations are S  corporations that are not required to pay tax.</p>
<p>For statistics on S Corporations visit <a href="http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/bustaxstats/article/0,,id=96405,00.html" rel="nofollow">IRS S Corporation Stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.pappasontaxes.com/index.php/2008/08/12/the-gao-study-on-corporate-taxes-is-useless-except-as-anti-corporation-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pappastax.com/?p=387#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Huh.  Am I understanding this correctly?  The C Corps were covered in the study, so they&#039;re the ones referred to in the study as &quot;most paid no tax. &quot; Is there a way of finding out what the S and limited liability Corps paid in INDIVIDUAL tax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  Am I understanding this correctly?  The C Corps were covered in the study, so they&#8217;re the ones referred to in the study as &#8220;most paid no tax. &#8221; Is there a way of finding out what the S and limited liability Corps paid in INDIVIDUAL tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

